Dramatic Incident Essay

Never messed up with me or else, I bequeath get back on you This is the line that the lot around me were used in hearing for almost 5 years, since my college days. I was such a braggart, an attention deficit student in our College Department in BS Psychology. I wanted to be always the center of attraction to anyone. All I wanted was attention, love and extol. The things which were deprived by my family, friends and peers. I house say that because of what and how people treated me when I was still in spirited school made me in to who I was in College and until now. When I was in high school, I used to be the laughing stock in our room.Why? because of how I facial expressioned. I did not appear appealing to my classmates and even teachers. They based their respect and love with looks. I was so devastated that time that it came to a point where I asked myself. Why am I like this? Why do I look like this? Why do I cook to be laughed of? Do not I acquit to right also to be respec ted and love? All these things ruled in my mind for 4 years in high school. It was not just in school, but also in my family, in my home They idea of me as nobody. They even didnt recognize my achievement. I tried my best to be an honor student for them to appreciate me, but I was just frustrated.They never did All their attention was with my beautiful sister. My ever loving, pretty and obedient sister named Grace. They always supported her on e very(prenominal)thing she does, in everything I was so mad at this reality That I distinct that when I finished high school, I will get my freedom. I will redeem my world back, the one they stole from me. accordingly I graduated high school as a Valedictorian. Never have I received any clasp or any rewards from them. only if they did not come that it was already my time to see and let them see the side of me that they would not want to see. I enrolled at a known University as a scholar.I enrolled in BS Psychology. Then by and by one semester, I flanked each(prenominal) my subjects, I quarreled with a professor, I had a fight with Mrs. McGowan, who is the Dean of our College. I was so happy upon seeing my family suffer because of what I have done. They were so angry that their anger put me into the dementia of happiness. It was just the start of my revenge. Then second semester came, I enrolled in BS Nursing. After one week they found out that I did not paid the money they gave me which was intended for my tuition. They were horrified at this Again, I was so happy. My mouth was filled with laughter then.After that event, I had a physical fight with a classmate. It made the Dean of Nursing call their attention for my detention. Then a week after that, I met a Mark. Our neighbor which was my long time friend. I courted the guy. Yes I was the one who courted him and good thing he said yes. We went out for 3 weeks then suddenly, one cold night. I asked him to elope with me. At premier(prenominal) he said no, for surely my parents were going to kill him. But I insisted and insisted. I blackmailed him that if he wont agree, I will kill myself. Then he finally said yes. In the morning after that, we did it.We went to a place where nobody knew about us. In a secluded place, there we stayed for deuce days. After those days, I received a phone call saying that my mom had a heart attack. I was horrified upon hearing this. Even if I am such a stupid and disobedient daughter, I still love and cherish my mother so much(prenominal). My mother who brought us up. The one toiled a living just for us to be in school and have a future. In hearing that bad news, I was so devastated and immediately decided to go back in our place. My boyfriend allowed me then so I immediately packed my things up and proceed to our home. I went there with my boyfriend.When we stepped into the house, all my siblings welcomed me with arms wide open. I could feel their love and care. They were all asking forgiveness at me. Th ey were sorry for they knew they caused me too much hurt starting from the past. We exchanged forgiveness. I have nothing to do but to forgive them. I love my siblings so much that I do not want any pain in the ass between us anymore. After we reconciled, we then went to the hospital to visit my mom. Upon arriving their, I talked with my mom. I asked forgiveness and her too. I explained my part and poured everything that I felt from the start.Just after I embraced my mom, she died. She held my hand so tight that I shouted from the very top of my voice. Oh Lord What have I done If not of what I did, she should have been alive talking to myself in front of the mirror. I was so guilty my conscience was eating me up. I cried, and cried. I asked forgiveness for all the things that I have done that caused her so much hurt. I regretted the day when I decided to take my revenge against them. I was so downcast, I was so gloomy. I thought to myself, I should have been the one lying dead in t he hospital bed and not my mother I felt like I was the killer.But my siblings hugged me and said they did not blame me for what happened. It should not have been that way if I was not eaten up by my anger. But then things already happened. I gauge things happen for a reason. They happen for a specific purpose in our lives, in my life. We should learn to forgive and forget. Forgive even if that person caused you too much pain, and forget, even if the experience and hurt is unforgettable. God has a purpose in everything. He let things happen in our lives for us to become strong and mansion in our faith in Him. We should learn to rely on Him and not to ourselves.God would not give us something we can not bear. He will never leave us nor forsake us, even to the lowest valleys in our lives. He will always be there for us. I have established that He is the only one that I need. I do not need anybody to feel love. I just need my Lord, my God He is all that I wanted which I should have realized from the beginning. He is my only refuge and strength in times of trouble. His love is just enough and very satisfying in my soul. He is my all in all. I believe that my mother is already happy in heaven. I know she has forgiven me already. And I know she is there with God, eternally.

Proactive: Following and Language Essay

Answer the following questions to help you reflect on whether or not you intention a more proactive or reactive language. Save document as 4.9 Proactive vs. Reactive and submit via the assignment link provided. This assignment counts 100 points.1. I think my language is by and large (proactive or reactive?)I think my language is mostly proactive. I try to look at life with an I can do attitude.2. more or less phrases I map a lot that is proactive isI choose, I will, Lets look at what we can do.3. Some phrases I use a lot that is reactive isI dont have the time, They make me so mad, I dont understand.4. I can replace my reactive phrases with the following proactive phrases I can try to understand, I would favour this instead of that, I choose5. Someone in my life who is a rightfully good example of how to use proactive language is My parents are really good examples of how to use proactive language. They often encourage me and have a positive attitude towards life.6. The places o r situations in my life where I tend to use proactive language are I tend to use proactive language when I feel like I am in control. particularly in situations like when I am trying to find a solution to a problem or when I am trying to cleanse on something.7. The places or situations in my life where I tend to use reactive language are I am most likely to use reactive language when I dont want to take responsibility for something or when I feel like I am the dupe of a situation. When I am having a bad day or want to get out of doing something I use reactive language.

“Astronomer’s Wife” by Kaye Boyle Essay

In the opening paragraph of Kay Boyles Astronomers Wife, Boyle depicts a wo hu slice race who is oppressed of an equal, intelligent conversition with her spouse. Mrs. Ames sees to all matters of running a successful household, while the stargazer sleeps late and is a loner. His profession makes it clear that he spends a lot of time in thought and alone in the dark at night. Boyle explains, He was a man of other things, a dreamer. At times he lay still for hours, at others he sat upon the roof behind his telescope, or wandered down the pathway to the road and out across the mountains.Since the astronomer is often in his own world, Mrs. Ames is expected to cater to his needs. That man might be each time the new arching wave, and woman the undertow that sucked him back, were things she been told by his silence were so. This quote exemplifies how involved in his work the astronomer is. Whenever he is on the brink of a brilliant idea, she interrupts his train of thought. Therefore, she i s the undertow that breaks the force of the arching wave.The astronomer was obviously obsessed with his work leaving minor time to act as a husband. The marriage appears to be one that compromises Mrs. Amess, and perhaps the astronomers, happiness. This is where the plumber is introduced and Mrs. Ames begins to find stimulation outside her marriage. Something as childly as a conversation with a plumber about a stopped elbow is enough to trigger an awakening in Mrs. Katherine Ames. When Mrs. Ames realized that the plumber was talking about something she understood, she in turn realized that her marital problems were not the result of a division between the sexes instead, she avalid one. She is not happy with a man who wants to go up and that she rather prefers down. Through meeting the plumber, she recognizes this and is called to go down. Mrs. Ames is seeking happiness and someone in whom she can relate. She needs something that speaks to her, something that centre something to h er, and she wants to change.Mrs. Ames feels a connection to the plumber. He involves her in his theory and she develops her own thoughts. Where her husband treats her as unimportant, the plumber makes her bewildered that it should be a man who had spoken to her so. The astronomers wife is trapped in a lifelessmarriage and somewhere there appears a line in which she is not certain if she should cross. The plumber has made her feel like she thought no man ever could. The point is simple Mrs. Ames has desired respect over the years and at last along comes a man that gives her that much needed self-dignity.When ones feelings are taken advantage of or neglected, it is natural for that person to begin to note for a beau who will nurture those needs. Whether this is an act that is carried out subconsciously or intently does not matter. In the case of Mrs. Ames it is happening without her permission, but until now as she tries to deny her inner feelings and needs she finds them leaking through, like water from a pipe, and the reader begins to wonder if maybe the plumber wasnt there just to pile a dripping wash-basin.

How do the writers present sexuality and gender in Tales Of Ovid?

G prohibiter roles switch been continu onlyy redefined throughout literary history. The develop gentlemans gentlemanpowert of awakenuality and g depoter is maped in Behind The Scenes At The Museum, A Streetcar Named Desire and Tales Of Ovid as drive by context and in particular patriarchal society.From Hughes classical exhibit of a human affectionateness in extremis1, so satisfying that it combusts, levitates, or mutates into an experience of the supernatural2 to Streetcars succes de s tidy sumdale3, dealing with sex to an extent, and in a manner not yet encountered on the stage and then Museums unfertilised and comical view of sex, the mutability of sexual urge and grammatical gender has transcended generations tho has been subject to airing literary perspectives. The class of fluidity of gender can be forgively seen to mirror the context of societal and historical metamorphose within which the three works were created.In the introduction of Ovid, Hughes describes the significance of the tales being written at the upshot of the birth of Christ within the Roman Empire. The classical/ Roman pantheon had fallen in on mens heads4 and Hughes makes a clear attempt to equate A tangle withis with Jesus Christ, describing him as the miraculous baby5 and perfection6. For all its Augustean stability, Rome was at sea in hysteria and des geminate, caught in a guidance between the sufferings of the gladiatorial atomic number 18na and a searching for spiritual transcendence.This era of volatility is reflected in the marked fluidity of sexuality in Hughes Ovidian world, where men and women becomes birds and trees. As such, identity itself-importance is problematic gender can no longer be exclusively prescriptive. According to Leo Curran, Ovid recognised the fluidity, the breaking round of boundaries, payable to the uncontrollable variety of nature and the unruliness of human passion. 7 Hughes unsettlingly explores this in the story of Salmacis and Hermap hroditus, where the carnal nymph Salmacis rapes the timid boy Hermaphroditus.You can read alsoSimilarities and Conflicts in a Streetcar Named DesireAs he continues to struggle, she prays that we neer, never/ shall be separated, you and me8. Her plea is hubristically answered and, with a smile, the gods look on as the two bodies/ melted into a single body/ seam little as the weewee. 9 The conjunction of the two sexes seems incompatible as detect in the drowning of what a modern audience would recognise as a hermaphrodite. Hughes selection of this myth, with the same foul conclusion as Ovids original, conveys the commingling of the two sexes as resulting in the debilitation of the male qualities, rather than their enduringnessening, therefore contri justeing effeminacy pejoratively.The dissolution of gender boundaries is reiterated by Hughes in his story of Tiresias. Tiresias passage through femininity, having lived and love in a womans bodyand also in the body of a man10 le aves him with the crotchety experiences of both sexes. His knowledge about feminine pleasure, that women do, as Jupiter contends end up with nine-tenths of the pleasure, angers Jupiter and his revelation proves damaging as she blinds him. It takes moreover one man, formerly a woman, to destroy the reassuring view that placed wives beyond the influence of pleasure.Social upheaval was also explicit at the beginning of the 20th century. Two cosmea Wars had, temporarily, shifted the gender power balance with women filling vacant male roles moreover for these to be reassumed in the 50s. William Streetcar is an astute depiction of the continual metamorphosis gender roles were encountering in the struggle for supremacy, both at home and nationally between the Old South and the New America. In Streetcar, Blanche, as a grammatical construction of the ante gongum, is taken a behavior, expiration Stanley holding his new son.The new decedent acts as a type of the end of the decaying Du Bois line and a sort of victory for the new Kowalski family. As the Cambridge Companion To Tennessee Williams states Theatregoers did not easily quaver off lingering apprehensions that were born of the 1930s depression and nurtured by the 1945 unleashing of nuclear weapons in this climate, the loose organize and morale ambiguities of Streetcar struck a chord of truth. 11 Furthermore, when Williams describes Stanley shouting Sttellah 12 in a heaven split up voice, we see the unless power of the Kowalskis, who corroborate rocked the spatial relation quo to the same extent as genus Venus doomed love13 in Ovid, that means she has neglected even Olympus14. Ted Hughes exploration of gender fluidity is a more progressive one, in that a 21st century audience is much more receptive to transgender and sexual deviance than Tennessee Williams contemporaries. Williams homosexuality was illegal for the dandyer part of his bearing, but he found ways, establish or oblique, of speaking of them in his plays.There is, indeed, a real guts in which Williams is a harvest-festival of his work. When he began to write he was plain Tom. The invention of Tennessee was not merely coterminous with the elaboration of internal representation fictions it was of a piece with it. In that sense it is not entirely fanciful to suggest that he was the fruit of the discourse of his plays. Indeed he created female alter egos, such as Blanche in Streetcar, before he began, as he did in later life, to dress up as a woman15. Where did his work end and his life begin?The man who consigns Blanche to insanity later found himself in a straitjacket. As amateur Hana Sambrook more explicitly notes there be those who believe that the tragic figure of Blanche Dubois is a transsexual presentation of the promiscuity of Williams himself16. Certainly, Blanches m whatsoever a(prenominal) intimacies with strangers17, her unfeminine like licentiousness and charade of hypocrisy aligns Williams with his protagonist. For a man for whom the concealment of his true sexual identity was for long a necessity, the fragmentation of the self into multiple roles offered a possible refuge.Blanche enters the play an actress and Williams creates her character as a serial publication of roles, by using structural techniques to focus the audience upon her even when off stage heard bathe serenely as a bell18 whilst singing obliviously in contrapuntal19 contrast to the lurid revelations of her past being detailed by Stanley in the adjoining room. Blanches desire for disguise is a phony affectation, using the smoke and mirrors of her alcoholicism and fine clothing, to trump up an elaborate alternative reality she can abscond to, enabling her to put on soft influence, the colours of butterfly wings, and glow20.This indirect, dramatic language and vivid imagery is typical of her escapism and her view of herself as delicate21 reinforces the image of Blanche as a fragile moth that pervades Williams stage directions. Despite this, Williams does not wholly present Blanche as a faded Southern belle22 as some critics claim, but rather sheds a favorable light on Blanches attempts to protect and preserve the genteel values of the old Southern civilisation.Williams states that Blanche was the close rational of all the characters hed created, evident in her contradictory wilful ignorance of the causes of the loss of Belle Reve, yet her understanding that the rootage cause was her familys epic fornications. Williams also reveres Blanche as his strongest character in many ways23 and her singular internal integrity of Never inside, I didnt lie in my heart24 has seen her resist the atrocity and savagery of a relentless modern society. Thus, even to the very end of the play, Blanche has never yielded to any usual violent actions and rude behaviour, crying FireFire during Mitchs attempted rape and fighting Stanley to her material limit with a broken bottle when eventually violated. When the big Matron tries to subdue her physically on the appal, she never stops resisting until the Doctor gently offers her his arm like a real gentleman. Blanches dignified leaving further indicates her spiritual integrity, as critic Robert James Cardullo25 claims Blanches ascension from crucifix pinioning on the floor and her spirited slip awaying the way out of the hell of her sisters home creates a locomote tragic catharsis for the audienceBlanches defeat has considerable aesthetic dignity. Williams literature was strangely unmoved by the issue of gay rights and the issue of homosexuality that was so prominent in his semiprivate life, while clearly a strand in his work, was never a central theme and certainly never defended or promoted, neither publically nor politically. He seems to use Blanche as an expression of a deviation which clearly existed between his morality and sexuality, never to be resolved and never aired fully in his plays, despite its pertinence in the plays political context.By contrast, in Behind The Scenes many aspects of life seem constant and the stability of gender roles seems to reflect this. In Museum, the past permeates the present and the present is doomed to replicate the past. The shop ghosts and objects such as the pink glass button that goes rolling down the years act as chronological touchs expressions and history repeats itself through the lives of successive women. Sophia, Alice, Nell and Bunty all lead lives vitiate by misery, disappointment and domestic drudgery.None of these women marry for love and all encounter marital strife. Alice, an poerty-stricken widower marries Frederick in order to give up teaching, Nell marries Frank out of desperation, her two previous fiances having been killed in the war, and Bunty marries George when abandoned by her American fiance Bick. Thwarted in potential, trapped and unhappy, the women sh be a sense that they ar living the wrong life26.Parallels between past and present create a sense of historical inevitability that is endorsed by a series of echoes between the lives of different women. Nell falls for Jack who has high, piercing cheekbones like razor clam shells27 and by the end of the novel, Ruby has fallen for a strikingly standardised Italian with cheeks as sharp as knife blades28. Bunty looks like Nell and Ruby looks like Alice. The latter pair both believe in destiny29 and embrace it in the mistaken form of men.Alice, Bunty and Ruby have all had enough30. With typically perceptive narration for her tender age, Ruby com locateions for this hereditarily as one of those amusing genetic whispers crosswise time dictates that in moments of stress we will all (Nell, Bunty, my sisters, me) brush our hands across our foreheads in exactly the same way that Alice has just done31. The reference point to genes by Atkinson implies that behavioural patters are inherent and inescapable.Even Adrian, as the sole gay man in the novel, is presented in clich ed footing as having an interest in hairdressing, his intimate conversation with a barman prompting a dramatically ironic exclamation of thats queer32 from the unwitting Uncle Clifford. Gender roles within all three texts are enforced through the sexual dominance of men over their female companions. Critic C. W. E Bigsby note that the shock of Streetcarlay in the fact that this was the first American play in which sexuality was patently at the core of the lives of all its characters, a sexuality33.Williams presents sex as having the power to salvage or destroy, to compound or negate the forces, which bore on those caught in a moment of great social change. The gaudy seed bearer34 Stanley is a bestial representation of the new South and he uses his intense virility and sexual power to great effect. His sexual magnetism is exemplified by the attributeic piece of ground of meat thrown to a visibly delighted Stella in the opening scene. The connotations of his sexual proprietorshi p over Stella and her sexual infatuation with him are not mixed-up on the watching Negro woman.In unconditional contrast, Bunty feigns deafness at the butchers innuendo laced conversations35, exposing him as a bluff hoax of himself36. Her caustic description of him as a pigsmooth shiny skin stretched tightly over his buttery flesh37 is both comical and telling in her uptight rejection of his smutty behaviour. This mordant tone continues into the awkwardly comical depictions of male sexual supremacy in Behind The Scenes fornications.Rubys designing by a typically tipsy George and equally typically stoic Bunty who is pretending to be slumbrous38, summarises well Atkinsons presentation of a tired female submission to male virility in the repressed society of 40s England. Georges demise is with his trouser round his ankles, a less than dignified epileptic penguin39, as the World Cup final carries on regardless40 in another(prenominal) typically callous death of Behind The Scenes. T his dominance leads to a trapping sexual dependence of women upon men, symbolically reflected by Williams in the eponymous streetcar, bound for Desire, and then for the Cemeteries41.The streetcar stands for Blanches headlong descent into fortuity at the hands of her lust. Like the streetcars destination, Desire, the stop called Elysian Fields is an obvious symbol an ironic fantasy however, as the Elysian Fields the abode of the blessed dead in Greek mythology turns out to be a rundown street in New Orleans. The very same symbol of the rattle trap streetcar42 is used by both sisters in scene 4, as a euphemism for sexual experience. They speak explicitly of the blunt desire43 that decides their choice. In answer to Stellas question oasist you ever ridden on that street-car? 44 Blanches bitter riposte of it brought me here45 displays both self-knowledge and self-condemnation of her accepted destitution. Ominously the matter-of-fact Stella offers no words of self-criticism prior t o the only fleeting moment that she confronts her guilt oh god, what have I done to my sister? 46. Moments later, in the middle of her luxurious47 sobbing, she yields to Stanleys lovemaking, compounding her guilt. This dependence is echoed in Tiresias from Ted Hughes Ovid where women are said to take nine tenths of the pleasure48 during sex.Men are vital for women to experience any sexual satisfaction and female desire ultimately renders them reliant and weakened. Their dependence is compounded by a financial reliance. Marxist feminist theory argues an economic dependence on men deprives women of the right to miss their own fate, reducing them to existence by male affiliation. On a teachers recompensebarely sufficient for her living expenses49, Blanche had to come to New Orleans for the summer as she didnt save a penny last year50.In the wake of her husbands suicide and the epic fornications51 of her grand vexs and father and uncles and brothers52, she is forced again to turn to m en for financial support, depending, as is her mantra on the kindness of strangers53. Her attempted allurement of Stanley is based on the recognition that maybe he is what we need to mix with our blood now that weve lost Belle Reve54. Her spiral of desperation turns to Mitch and finally the nebulous millionaire Shep Huntleigh who comes to stand as a symbol of material strength of dependence and guarantee for women, more exactly for Blanche.Blanche recognises that Stella could be happier without her physically abusive husband, Stanley, yet her alternative of Shep save involves complete dependence on men. When Stella chooses to remain with Stanley, she chooses to rely on, love, and believe in a man sooner of her sister. Williams does not necessarily criticise Stellahe makes it quite clear that Stanley represents a much more practiced future than Blanche does. That Shep never materialises strongly suggests that if women place their hope and fortune on men, their oppressed and subor dinate status can never be changed.Bunty, like Stella, who has to request that her husband better give her some capital55, confirms her reliance on George in having no intention of working after her marriage56. Buntys quest for stardom and self-discovery conflicts with a mode of motherhood that requires service, sacrifice, and selflessness. As she moves into adulthood during World War II, Bunty tries out a series of different quixotic identities in the search for selfhood Deanna Durbin57, Scarlett OHara58 and Greer Garson59.However, as her family grows, her dreams diminish, and Bunty is forced to forgo a self she has not yet fully realised. The erosion of self is symbolised by the abbreviation of her name for Bernice, to Bunty, which George truncates to Bunt60. Ironically, George marries Bunty only because he thinks she will be a big help in the shop61 and thus Bunty is comically presented as trapped in the role of the Martyred wife62 despite her belief that marriage to George woul d free her from the graft that she imagines herself to be above.Rubys mock expression of pity in her narrative gives an account of Buntys woes in a sardonic tone her tranquilisers are Buntys little helpers63 and Atkinsons silly portrayal of Bunty as put out but ultimately accepting of her role as a married woman contrasts with Williams poignant subdual of Blanche and Stella. Sexual and financial dominance coalesces in another tool for the seduction of women rape. Hughes presents his women in terms of capital value Philomena is a priceless gift, available to cash in your whole kingdom for64.As a result of rape in Streetcar and Ovid, the victimised females are presented as devalued and diminished in worth in the views of patriarchal society. Myrrha, utterly disgusted with her life65 is described as polluted66 and contaminated67 in the wake of her incestuous act, which removes her from life and death in some nerveless limbo68. Male exploitation of Blanches sexuality has left her wit h an equally suffering reputation.This notoriety makes Blanche an unattractive marriage prospect, but, because she is destitute, Blanche sees marriage as her only possibility for survival, trapping her in the roll of submission to men. It is telling that Blanches rape is not condemned, and it can be argued that Williams portrays her violation as ineluctable in patriarchal culture and also self-inflicted by her provocative behaviour, a controversial thought for a modern audience. In her ingratiation of Mitch, she uses all kinds of strategies to deceive him enough to make him-want69 and conceals her true age, because Men dont want anything they get too on the loose(p).But men lose interest quickly when the missy is over-thirty70. This represents the internalisation of patriarchal society that her behaviour has precipitated. Her trunk, symbolic of her own displaced and materialistic identity, is full of the flashy pretension of fake finery that she perceives men to desire, and the Chinese lampshade softens the glare of the Mitchs gaze on her fading mantrap and adds to the magic Blanche desires the dressing up of ugly reality. However, both are ultimately violated with a strong sense of dramatic irony.When first Mitch and then Stanley tear off the paper lantern, she cries out as in pain. The opening of the trunk becomes a divesture of interiority Stanleys question what is them underneath? 71 becomes a central one as the trunk functions as a metonymy for some unchartered territory about to be fundamentally disrupted, but to no condemnation from the playwright. Similarly, even when the male hunter Actaeon is punished upon inadvertently offending the nakedly bathing goddess Diana with his sight, Hughes suggests that Actaeons crime was one of fortune Destiny, not guilt, was enough/For Actaeon.It is no crime/To lose your way in a dark wood72. Hughes suggests here that Actaeons death is the necessary ordeal to lead him through hell to paradise. When sexual aggres sion or rape is exhibited by females however, the result and portrayal are markedly different. Salmacis and Blanche are remarkably alike in this respect. Salmacis is a naiad (a nymph who presided over springs and brooks) and as such is described in typically natural imagery as perfect / as among damselflies73, aggregation lilies for a garland74.This peaceful language of the natural world is tinged however with a more prevision aggression in the viper75 like elegance of her sinewy otter76 like body, which portends her sexual experience in contrast to the innocent young boy Hermaphroditus, who blushes at the naming of love. Hughes places the emphasis on the feminine snares of the lascivious water nymph, who is aggressively sexual in a very Blanche like manner. She knows she had to have Hermaphroditus77 and proceeds to unashamedly flirt, checking her encircle her cleavage78.Her sensual language is heightened by its inference of a taboo love with the incestuous reference of what a lu cky sister As for the mother/ Who held you, and pushed her nipple between your lips/ I am already sick with envy79, exemplifying her sexual command over the boy, who refuses her advances without really knowing what she wants. He desires only to bathe and his obliviousness to her advances are indicative of his youth and inexperience but also his male gender precluding him from the experience of passion, as echoed in the nine tenths of the pleasure80 that the female takes in Tiresias.Thus he becomes an easy prey and Like a snake81 she flings and locks her coils/ around him82, a tangle of constrictors, nippled with suckers83 the disturbing organic metaphors further exemplifying her atypical literary position as the female aggressor of rape. Throughout this scene however, Salmacis is never rendered as in sexual control Hermaphroditus will not surrender/ or yield the to the lowest degree kindness/ of the pleasure she longs for/ and rages for, and pleads for84. Hughes implication of the ir demise as a result of their unnatural union is clear the only way in which a woman can rape a man is if he is not clearly male.To conclude, in the words of an anonymous critic gender roles figure so conspicuously in literature that they begin to take on a life of their own, whereas to become fluid in the mind of the writer and reader alike it is evident that when working with ambiguity, man and woman, whose boundaries are few and far-off between, become locked in a dimension of transmutation. These words said of Ovid, offer a compact summary of the three works, applicable mainly to Hughes characters such as Salmacis and Tiresias, and Williams Blanche.Ultimately however, despite the differing time periods in which they were written the role of gender is an inextricable fibre in ancient, southern and modern literature. The three writers posit sexuality and gender contrastingly Williams uncompromising personally and socially powerful85 play, Hughes matter-of-fact narration and At kinsons comically cliched bildungsroman. A prominent similarity in the treatment of gender by all three authors is the ability of each to manipulate and intertwine not only their ideas of the gender line but also those of their contextual popular culture in order to effectively and complexly examine its role.

Machiavelli’s story Essay

He wrote to medick embellished with magnificent words together with extrinsic allurements wishing the medics honor should give him the frame of the office that he definitely was stuffing of. He contemplated and made assumptions of himself being humble and low beforehand the concerns of the princes, pret finaleing to have understood the needs of people. He also thought that the book was a benefaction to the prince to entice him in order to be given a vacancy in the spic-and-span government.He regular recommends to the prince to intelligently and diligently read and consider the book as in the Prince will end up learning Machiavellis extreme desire for prince to attain the greatness that fortune and other attributes promise. Machiavelli judge that the principalities are all hereditary to power and its acquisition is accustomed to live under the prince by all fortune or ability. He anticipated that the prince should keep the corrupt government continue to rule for the benefits o f the a couple of(prenominal) him included against to which what it was. His story from is was ultimately different from what it should be.For instance, Duke of Ferrara in Italy who could not have withstood the attacks of the Venetians in 1984 nor those of Pope Julius in 1910 unless of the establishment of dominions. For hereditary prince has less cause to and less necessity to offend to happen that he will be more loved but the vice versa caused him to be more hated as it was commonsensical that Machiavellis subject naturally disposed him off from the prince, his motives was derived to no existence of change and his own description of change was the one that leaves the toothing for another to keep the corrupt government from one generation to another that impossibly didnt happen.Machiavellis story was defining change as the deception of the willing election of the new ruler hoping to better themselves expectation that could hardly rise from the inherent difficulties from the new to be principalities. He figures solidarity as hardship that he mustiness put upon his new acquisition in order to satisfy those who elected Medic into power. Machiavelli egocentrically viewed himself as the core pillar for the success of Medics government, thus he must be given the position on this regime to excel.He beliefs not that Borge Cesare lost power by malignity of fortune that he acquired during the ascendancy of his father. In Machiavellis story, he didnt imagine to wield about the so called enemies whom he injured in seizing principality and he is not even considering the essence for them to feel satisfied as the way the expected or hopped when they were electing you into power. Instead Machiavelli suggested for the strong measures to be taken against them, feeling not bound to them anymore and they are profound to be oppressed by the use of the strong forces under the command of the leader in charge.This was totally different from even the notional view of Medic whe n he came into power. His mission and vision was to have equality among all those who elected him, stem/ eradicate corruption and that is why he disputed the gift from Machiavelli that was vividly giving him a speck towards the corrupt government to benefit the a few including Machiavelli. Medic wasnt gullible for the public properties as the story of Machiavelli portray him as somebody who is gullible, selfish/mean, corrupt and egocentric.Basing on Machiavellis story, he viewed that the include of accustomed hereditary pass of power was a prudent courtesy from the ancestors and anybody doing contrary to it was like immorality towards the ancestors. In order to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise and for the care to maintain Medic in state Machiavelli must be in the cabinet in the government and if not so something sinister will happen to deprive Medic extra-ordinary from power, which was untrue and didnt happen. Reference 1. The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli, Transl ated By George Bull Published By Penguin Books Ltd (1995).

12 Angry Men †Critical Thinkers Essay

In Twelve Angry workforce, a young man is on trial for stabbing and killing his grow. The movie focuses on twelve randomly selected citizens who are assigned the employment of determining the fate of this 19 year aging man. The jury is supposed to experience certain facts and set up the truth based solely on the evidence presented to them in court. It is assumed that the jurymans will jurist sensibly and without personal bias. Basically, the jurors need to use exact view during this trial to figure out what evidence is actual and what evidence is false. Throughout the film, some jurors were better at fine thinking than others, some had obstacles to over keep abreast before batch they could use good critical thinking skills, and yet others became critical thinkers at different points during the movie. Critical thinking played a key role in Twelve Angry Men. In order to be able to think outside the box, one must possess the ability to think unbiaslly, not drive personal is sues into play, not be scared to put the ideas and doubts on the table, and to be level headed.The juror who have these skills the best and applied them better than his eleven other companions was juror number 8, played by enthalpy Fonda. At the beginning of the movie, juror 8 was the only one to vote not guilty on the first vote. Fondas character plainly stated Its not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy to die without talking most it first. This shows that he wanted to examine all the evidence and facts before coming to his decision. As the movie went on, juror 8 kept session questions standardized could it be possible and could he be wrong to remind others that about reasonable doubt. therefore Fondas character helped find holes in two key pieces of evidence, one being the knife use in the murder. The switchblade knife was supposed to one of a kind, but juror 8 takes a knife out of his pocket and jams it into the table next to the knife that was used in the murder. T he knives were identical and Fondas character explains that he bought it in the same neighborhood. The second piece of evidence juror 8 base reasonable doubt in was the old mans testimony. The old claims he heard the sea wolf yell I m gonna kill you, a second later he heard the fathers body fall and he saw the boy running out of the house xv seconds after. Juror 8 decided to reenact the scene, paying attention to detail my dragging his foot like the old man, as well as, measuring the distance so that it was accurate.Fondas character proved the old mans story was false because it took thirty-one seconds. Juror 8 payed attention to details, analyzed both detail, put aside his biases, and opened the eyes of the other jurors, this is why he was a great critical thinker. Although there were some good critical thinkers in Twelve Angry Men, there were a fewer jurors who still couldnt see outside the box until it was almost too late. Juror 10 seemed to be the most close minded of all his peers, resulting in big(p) critical thinking. There were instances where this character stamp the defendant racially by saying those people,them, they are born liars and they do not cling to human life. Juror 10 also referred to calling the boy ignorant and a slob. This juror not only treated the defendant poorly, but his behavior towards his companions was ignorant. Juror 10 was sarcastic, insensitive, lacking morals, attribute grudges, and a loud mouth. For instance, juror 10 sarcastically says youre a smart fellow arent you? to juror 8 in response to a piece of evidence that had been shredded. All of these characteristics are ones that vitiate the mind and do not allow common sense or critical thinking to come into play. There were three individuals that held so much grudhe, anger and aggression that it prevented them from thinking critically.One of these peers was juror 3. He claimed that the defendant was certainly guilty and his reasons for thinking this was completel y prejudice. He brought thoughts of anger, resentment and revenge into the jury because his possess son left him. For this he thinks and blames all young folks. Another jury who was a bad critical thinker is number 2. He tends to follow the crowd and feels like its an open and closed case. He doesnt want to see the facts as they are nor does he want to listen to what anyone says. The last juror who bad at thinking critically was 6. Though he gave juror 8 a chance, the reason was because he was too narrow headed to figure out the evidence wase. He couldnt connect any of the dots nor did he speak up very much in the discussion. Twelve Angry Men had good examples of how the second-rate person uses critical thinking, which is while the process of conversion is occurring? For some reason the light bulb dings on after we listen to others explain their thoughts. Jurors 9, 11 and 7 were like most of us. During the trial juror 9 kept voting guilty until Fondas character started talking abo ut the old mans character and the womans eyesight.He voted not guilty after he thought about the old mans character being alone, never had recognition in life for anything, and he wanted some so the old man lied. Juror 9 had to overcome his own light of himself being old and not really needed for much in order to be a critical thinker and realize his opinions count too. Like juror 9, juror 7 had to overcome his concentration of going to a Yankees game. Throughout the film, he kept voting guilty and wherefore after he heard jurors 8 and 10 talk about how the woman wore glasses and she didnt have them on when she saw the murder. When this happened, juror 7 realised that there was reasonable doubt in the case. This only happens after he voted not guilty just to get to the ball game and Fondas character asks him why, which then makes 7 pay attention and think. Juror 11 was an immigrant who was scared and easily swayed by his peers.He had the obstacle of trying to stand up for himsel f, understand his voice counts and that his mind works just like others. Juror 11 conquered this obstacle when juror 8 was talking about the wound, he realized that the someone taller would have had to been the killer. He also explained to the others that a switchblade is use in an upward motion. at one time these characters got over their obstacles, their critical thinking skills helped open holes in the case. All in all, Twelve Angry Men was a great learning tool to what critical thinking is and how to apply. This film taught me that you have to approach decisions in a certain manner. I need to keep an open mind, be level-headed, express my opinions and not judge others. Thinking critically implies that brain power of yours and your peers is needed to get a better understanding of public life. Respecting others around you is key. In order to use critical thinking, one must know what it entails.

Jefferson Essay Essay

doubting Thomas Jefferson played a very central role in the history of the United States. Jefferson is most famously kn take for writing the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson talked many condemnations about African-Americans in America. Where they equal to flannel people? How were whites and blacks different? What about bondage? Thomas Jefferson had an opinion on all in all of these subjects, but much of what Thomas Jefferson verbalise was later contradicted with his own words. What did Thomas Jefferson mean when he said that all men were equal?Well, many people would touch with what it nub today in modern times. Today the statement, all men argon created equal means all men and women whether black, white, tall, short, fat, or skinny were all created equal. That is not necessarily what it meant in the 1700s. Blacks were enslaved and worked hard go laden white men did nothing of the sort. Justice Thurgood Marshall said, The blacks were so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to bondage for his benefit. This excerpt shows that in that time blacks were not treated the same as whites and clearly did not fuck off the same rights. Conor Cruise OBriens book confirms this belief as he takes a extract from Thomas Jefferson himself It is accepted that the words all men are created equal do not, in their material meaning, apply to women, and were not intended by the Founding Fathers to apply to slaves. This shows that when Thomas Jefferson talks about all men being created equally he means to say white men.The meaning of the word transferral is as follows to leave ones native country to live elsewhere (Merriam-Webster). Jefferson wanted to lay the blacks that were descendent of the original slaves back to Africa. The deal here was Africa was no longer their native country. This act was know as transportation. The southern courts call upd that sl avery violated the natural rights of blacks and although slavery was allowed and legal it was immoral and unjust. Thomas Jefferson do it known that he supported the abolishment of slave trading.He said the following to Congress kip down the citizens of the United States from all further participation in those violations of tender rights which have been so long proceed on the un offend inhabitants of Africa. By this Jefferson means that the people of the United States should stop the enslavement of blacks so that they no longer violate the human rights and stop offending the people of Africa. In this way Jeffersons reasons for promoting expatriation and understanding for the natural rights of blacks were consistent.He wanted to send the blacks back because he wanted to stop offending the people of Africa. Jefferson believed that blacks and whites were very different. He said that he believed that blacks were originally their own race and became distinct by time and certain circu mstances. According to Jefferson blacks came from their own species but were from the same general genus that is the human race. He said that blacks were inferior to whites in mind and body. This can be said to mean that whites were maybe better face people or that they were more fit.It could have been said to mean that whites were smarter than blacks because they had an education that the blacks did not have. Jefferson did not believe blacks were men. Men, was said to be referred to as only white men. Samuel Eliot Morison says in his book In his views (Jefferson) blacks were not men. The monomania of individual rights was mainly determined by ones race or skin color. Blacks had no rights early on in the 1700s but began to become free in the early 1800s. A wealthy white male had all rights he was allowed to do what he wanted so long as it was just.A black man was free and eventually gained simple rights due to the belief that the United States was violating human rights. I do no t believe that expatriation could have been a helpful solution to the task of slavery in America. I believe this because if the slaves would have gone to Africa they would be gone, but there is no saying that the lazy southern farmers would not have brought in slaves from other places. They would have gotten so employ to not having to work that they would not be able to start working again.I think that they would possibly keep indentured servants as permanent slaves or enslave poor people. Im for certain that expatriation would not solve the problem of slavery, at least not immediately. As I utter in the beginning, Jeffersons view changed greatly throughout the course of his lifetime. Later in his life he began to appreciate black people more because of all their hard work. Also, he realized that blacks were the same as whites in that they were to be given human rights and that the people of the United States had been violating their rights from the very beginning.Jefferson also saw that blacks were men, and that in reality God created all men equal, black and white. Thomas Jefferson certainly lived an intriguing life. He lived during a time where slavery was legal. He lived during a time when slavery began to die out. Jefferson was part of the reason why blacks are free today. Although his beliefs shifted throughout the duration of his life he ended on the good side, the side that was just. He began to believe that all men are created equal with a literal meaning.