The Failures of Affirmative Action :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

The Failures of optimistic Action Once upon a time, in that location were two people who went to an interview for only one stage business coif at the same company. The first person attended a honored and highly academic university, had years of work experience in the matter and, in the mind of the employer, had the potential to make a positive have-to doe with on the companys performance. The second person was just starting out in the field and seemed to lack the ambition that was visible in his opponent. Who was chosen for the job? you ask. Well, if the story took place before 1964, the resultant role would be obvious. How incessantly, with the somewhat modern adoption of the social policy known as affirmative action, the answer becomes unclear. After the United States Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, it became unpatterned that certain business traditions, such as seniority status and skill tests, prevented total equality in employment. Then President, Ly ndon B. Johnson, decided something needed to be done to remedy these flaws. On September 24, 1965, he issued Executive pronounce 11246 at Howard University that required federal contractors to take affirmative action to master that applicants are employed . . . without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin (Civil Rights). When Lyndon Banes Johnson sign-language(a) that order, he enacted one of the most discriminating pieces of legislature since the Jim Crow Laws were passed. Affirmative action was created in an effort to help minorities leap the discriminative barriers that were ever so familiarise when the bill was first enacted, in 1965. At this time, the solid ground was in the wake of nationwide civil-rights demonstrations, and racial tension was at its peak. approximately of the corporate executive and managerial positions were occupied by white males, who controlled the hiring and press release of employees. The U.S. government, in 1965, believed that these employers were discriminating against minorities and believed that there was no better time than the present to bring about change. When the Civil Rights Law passed, minorities, especially African-Americans, believed that they should receive retribution for the years of discrimination they endured. The government responded by passing laws to aide them in attaining better employment as reprieve for the previous two coke years of suffering their race endured at the hands of the white man. To many, this do sense.